Health and Human Services Raises Bar for Risk Analysis with latest HITECH Rules



Organizations will need to match features to security mitigations in qualifying electronic health records systems.

New guidelines from the U.S. Government's department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will require healthcare providers who want to qualify for big federal subsidies for the adoption of electronic health record (EHR) technology to prove they are addressing the security risks posed by EHR platforms, according to a published report.

In a statement on Tuesday, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) said that health providers will need to conduct more detailed risk analysis of their EHR systems to comply with the final rule for Stage 3 of HHS's meaningful use standard. That may include encrypting health data stored and transmitted by EHR systems, or adopting new "technical, administrative and physical safeguards" needed to lock down protected health information - or PHI. That, according to a report on the web site Healthcareinfosecurity.com.

Proving "meaningful use" of electronic health record technology is a prerequisite for qualifying for generous federal subsidies for adopting the technology. EHR adoption is a lynchpin in the federal government's efforts to move doctors' offices, hospitals and other healthcare providers away from inefficient, paper-based record keeping.

Risk analysis was a requirement to qualify for Stages 1 and 2 of the meaningful use program, as well. But the Stage 3 requirements take things a step further: asking healthcare providers to dig deep into their EHR systems and identify weaknesses and potential risks, then apply technology fixes that address those risks.

Each certification capability for an EHR system should be "paired with the appropriate privacy and security safeguard," ONC said in a statement to Healthcareinformationsecurity.com. For example: features that allow PHI to be transferred between electronic health record systems should be paired with related security features such as authentication, access control and data encryption or hashing that protects the transferred data, Healthcareinfosecurity.com reported.

That's critical. As this blog has reported, the combination of a federal push to use electronic health records systems, insecure cloud-based systems and motivated cyber criminals has created a "perfect storm" for healthcare providers and consumers. Most recently, data maintained by the firm Systema Software of Larkspur, California, which provides claims administration software and services to the insurance industry, was found publicly available on a subdomain on AWS that was associated with Systema. And, in July, a breach at the Indiana firm Medical Informatics Engineering (MIE) exposed PHI on some four million patients at more than 230 medical facilities that relied on MIE products, including the NoMoreClipBoard EHR system.

The so-called "Final Rule" guidance from HHS is intended to streamline requirements for providers and to give them a bit more time to comply with the Stage 3 provisions. Organizations seeking to qualify for meaningful use subsidies will have 60 days to comment on the Stage 3 guidelines and will have until 2018 to comply with the requirements.

Paul F. Roberts is the Editor in Chief of The Security Ledger and Founder of The Security of Things Forum.

Paul Roberts

Please post your comments here

451 Research: The DLP Market by the Numbers

Get the 451 take on the resurgence of the DLP market, with projections for market growth over the next five years and the top security challenges for 2016.

Download the report

Related Articles
Ashley Madison: The Information Economy’s Love Canal?

The hack of married person “hookup” site Ashley Madison is just the latest evidence that we need to reconsider the rewards and the risks of data in our information economy.

Missing in Michaels Data Breach: Harm To Consumers

A federal judge throws out a lawsuit against the craft store Michaels after plaintiffs fail to prove that any damages occurred as a result of the leak.

Optimizing Your Data Protection: Part Two

Watch the second installment in our two-part series with Tony Themelis on optimizing organizational data protection programs.