What Is an Insider Threat? Malicious vs. Negligent Threats
Thu, 06/09/2022
No one wants to think they have an employee or third party that is an insider threat, but mitigating these risks before they turn into complete attacks is key.
What Is an Insider Threat?
An insider threat is a malicious or negligent individual that is a security risk because they have access to internal information and can misuse this access.
External actors aren’t the only ones who pose risks to an organization’s cybersecurity. An insider threat is a peculiar security risk that originates from within the company, either deliberately or due to human error and carelessness. Hence, the insider threat poses the conundrum that an organization’s biggest assets can also be a source of risk.
What makes insider threats dangerous is the fact it is perpetrated by someone who has a relatively intimate knowledge of the company’s operations and therefore knows the lay of the land.
According to the 2022 Ponemon Cost of Insider Threats Global Report, insider threats have grown by 44% in the past two years alone. In addition, its cost per incident has ballooned up to $15.38 million, now a third of the previous amount.
Who or What Is an Insider?
As its name implies, insider threats arise from users who have legitimate access to an organization’s resources. This often includes information, equipment devices, personnel facilities, network, and system access.
Most often than not, this person is usually an employee, but they can also be a third-party contractor or vendor. In short, anyone who works directly with an organization can pose the risk of being an insider threat.
The following are some examples of insiders:
An individual who has been provided with a badge or access device like a contractor, vendor, or partner.
An individual in who an organization has placed an implicit amount of trust in, with privileged access to varying degrees of sensitive information.
An individual a company has provided some sort of computer and/or network access to.
Terminated or resigned employees who still have credentials or enabled profiles.
High-privilege users like programmers and software developers with access to data through a staging area or development environment.
A vendor or contractor who has some type of exclusive knowledge about an organization’s operations, fundamentals, business strategy, and goals either through providing products, services, or having privileged access to their secrets.
A government official or someone working for the government who has access to classified information that has national security implications if compromised.
Types of Insider Threats
Insider threats can come from anyone and from any level of the organization. However, those who perpetrate it successfully often have high-privilege access to data. Insider threats can be divided into two categories based on the intent: those that pose a risk unwittingly and those intentionally being malicious.
1. The careless insider: This activity borders on negligence when the insider unwittingly exposes the organization to outsider threats. These are often the result of unintentional mistakes, the most common of which are falling for phishing attacks or scams that infect the system with malware.Others include leaving misconfigured databases, poor administrative credentials, and improperly disposing of sensitive company documents.
The pawn: These are the unknowing group of insiders that have been manipulated and deceived to harm the organization. They are individuals who fall prey to social engineering or email spear-phishing attacks that make them give up their login credentials or click on harmful links that download malicious payloads.
The goof: These are insiders who put companies at risk due to their frivolity born out of incompetence, ignorance, or carelessness.
2. The mole: This individual is an imposter who nefariously gains insider status. This person might pose as a vendor, partner, or employee to gain privileged access to the company’s network or premises.
3. The malicious insider: Malicious insiders are the most dangerous category of insider threats. These are often employees, but they can also be contractors, vendors, or partners. They intentionally try to harm their organization by abusing their position either through malicious exploitation, stealing information, misusing data, abusing credentials, destroying data, and/or compromising networks.
The collaborator: A subset of the malicious insider is the person who collaborates with outsiders to commit an insider crime. They can partner with their company’s competitors, organized crime groups, or even nation-states. The objective could be to steal customer information, personally identifiable information, trade secrets, business operations, and intellectual property.
The lone wolf: These are independent actors who aren’t actively influenced, supported, or controlled by any external parties. These categories of malicious actors are usually dangerous because they are often highly motivated and singularly driven in the pursuit of their goal(s). Because they are confident they can pull off their nefarious acts alone; they are individuals who often have elevated privileges and high levels of access, such as systems administrators.
Why Insider Threats Occur
Most of the time, employees don’t join organizations with the intent to inflict harm on their company. Over time, greed and/or the accumulation of personal grievances, with the desire for revenge, eventually turn some individuals into malicious actors within an organization.
The vendetta of intentional threats is manifested in various ways such as sabotage, espionage, corruption, and theft; and they are most often expressed in hostile cyber acts.
Moreover, a combination of factors has equally heightened the propensity for insider threats to occur. Among these is the increased relevance of information-sharing and distribution of sensitive information, which provides disparate individuals with greater access to critical data.
Insider threats are often surreptitious and not immediately detectable. They can even go on for years because they are notoriously difficult to uncover.
For instance, the Canadian finance company, Desjardins Group had to settle a class-action lawsuit for $201 million. This was because a malicious insider capitalized on the seemingly benign but foolish company process of copying customer data to a shared drive so everyone could use it. The insider copied the data for over two years without detection until 9.7 million records were publicly disclosed.
How Can I Detect Malicious Insiders?
There are no foolproof ways to detect who has the potential of becoming an insider threat to your organization. But insider threat prevention requires marshaling resources to detect the elements that indicate an insider threat is likely imminent or possible.
People as Sensors
People are the first line of defense, especially in the identification and detection of potential insider threats in their fellow colleagues. Employees are more prone to carry out attacks against their employers when they are under a series of stressors. This pressure and stress can make them careless on the job and even grow to become disgruntled employees. Thus, they became prime targets and vulnerable to criminals and foreign agents.
Therefore, it would behoove employers to be on the alert for employees or insiders who exhibit certain concerning behaviors. Detecting and addressing these concerning behaviors early, then providing help, can make the difference between a loyal employee and an insider that commits a harmful act.
Monitoring Insider Activity
In addition to human observation and sensors, technology can also be used to detect vulnerabilities in the system that indicate the potential presence of an insider threat. For instance, if an employee seeks access to documents that have nothing to do with their job function or roles, then the system should be able to flag such activity.
Insider Steps Toward Malicious Activity
Stress may be a contributing factor to an insider threat, but it’s disingenuous to blame it alone for destructive and disruptive acts of sabotage. Those who study insider threats emphasize that its rarely spontaneous, but rather an evolution that moves through several critical pathways: